Why automated extraction delivers superior results, reliability, and efficiency for your laboratory

Time & Steps: The Reality Check
While extractionless seems faster, automated extraction delivers better results with less hands-on time
Extractionless PCR

Performance Comparison
Automated Extraction vs. Extractionless: Head-to-Head | ||
---|---|---|
Total Processing Time | 45 minutes | 35 minutes |
Manual Steps Required | 10 steps | 4 steps |
Hands-On Time (Per Sample) | 85 seconds | 25 seconds |
Nucleic Acid Recovery | Variable | Consistent (>98%) |
Cross-Contamination Risk | Higher | Minimal |
Technician Skill Required | High | Minimal |

Why Automated Extraction Wins
22% Faster Processing
Complete extraction in 35 minutes vs 45 minutes, with 6 fewer manual steps to reduce errors and improve efficiency.
Superior Accuracy
Magnetic bead technology delivers >98%
nucleic acid recovery with minimal
variability between samples.
70% Reduced Hands-On Time
Hands-on time reduced from 85 seconds per sample to 25 seconds per sample.
Reduced Contamination
Automated magnetic separation with UV
sterilization minimizes cross contamination risks.
Simplified Training
Intuitive touchscreen interface requires
minimal training, reducing onboarding time
and errors.
Staff Optimization
Reduce dependency on highly skilled
technicians and enable more efficient workforce allocation.
Calculate Your Time Savings Value
See how much you could save in labor costs by reducing total processing time from 45 minutes to 35 minutes and reducing hands-on time by 60 seconds per sample